This phrase represents a collaboration between a renowned fashion designer known for vibrant prints and a popular retail chain. It signifies the availability of garments with distinctive aesthetic characteristics at a more accessible price point, potentially expanding the designer’s reach to a broader consumer base. An example would be a brightly patterned sundress, available for purchase at a nationwide retailer.
Such collaborations can democratize high-end fashion, allowing more individuals to experience designer aesthetics. They can also benefit both the designer, through increased brand visibility, and the retailer, through attracting customers seeking unique product offerings. The history of such collaborations demonstrates a growing trend of merging high fashion with mass retail to mutual advantage.
The following sections will explore the design elements, target demographics, marketing strategies, and potential impact of this synergistic partnership on the fashion industry.
1. Limited-edition collection
The “limited-edition” nature of the Lilly Pulitzer at Target collection plays a crucial role in its overall impact. Scarcity drives demand, creating a sense of urgency among consumers. This tactic, often employed in fast-fashion collaborations, generates considerable pre-launch buzz and contributes to rapid sell-outs. The limited availability increases the perceived value of the items, potentially driving prices higher in the resale market. Examples of past designer collaborations with mass retailers demonstrate this pattern, with items frequently reselling at multiples of their original retail price. The limited-edition strategy amplifies the collection’s exclusivity, even within a widely accessible retail environment like Target.
This strategy serves several purposes. It mitigates the risk of brand dilution for the designer by maintaining a degree of exclusivity. It also benefits the retailer by driving traffic and generating significant media attention. The limited nature of the collection aligns with the desire for unique, distinctive pieces, appealing to a consumer base seeking items not readily available to everyone. The potential for resale value further incentivizes purchasing, creating a secondary market driven by scarcity.
Understanding the implications of a limited-edition release is crucial for both consumers and industry observers. Consumers benefit from recognizing the purchasing dynamics driven by scarcity. This awareness allows for informed purchasing decisions, weighing the desire for the product against the potential for inflated resale prices. For the fashion industry, analyzing the success and challenges of such limited-edition collaborations provides valuable insights into consumer behavior and evolving market trends. This understanding contributes to refining future strategies for designer-retailer partnerships.
2. Accessible price point
The accessibility of the price point significantly impacts the collaboration between Lilly Pulitzer and Target. Offering designer aesthetics at a lower cost expands the potential consumer base. This strategy allows individuals who might not typically purchase high-end fashion to access the brand. The lower price point generates broader appeal, potentially introducing the brand to a new demographic. This differs significantly from the brand’s typical pricing structure, making the collection attainable for a wider audience. Essentially, it democratizes the designer’s aesthetic, making it available to a larger market segment. This approach can be seen in other successful designer-mass retailer collaborations, such as Missoni for Target or Rodarte for H&M, where affordability played a key role in driving sales and brand awareness.
The affordability factor has several important implications. It can increase sales volume significantly, potentially offsetting the lower profit margin per item. The wider reach achieved through lower prices can introduce the brand to new customers, cultivating future brand loyalty even outside of the collaborative collection. This strategy can be particularly effective for aspirational brands, allowing consumers to experience the brand aesthetic without the typical financial barrier. However, maintaining perceived value at a lower price point presents a challenge. Balancing affordability with the designer’s established brand image requires careful consideration of materials, production methods, and overall design integrity. Successfully navigating this balance is crucial for preserving the brand’s reputation while expanding its reach.
The accessible price point serves as a critical component of the Lilly Pulitzer and Target collaboration’s strategy. It broadens accessibility to a normally exclusive brand, creating opportunities for both the designer and retailer to reach new markets. However, challenges remain in balancing affordability with maintaining brand perception and managing potential demand surges caused by increased accessibility. The long-term effects on brand perception and consumer behavior warrant further analysis as such collaborations become increasingly prevalent in the fashion industry.
3. Signature vibrant prints
Signature vibrant prints represent a cornerstone of the Lilly Pulitzer brand identity, intrinsically linked to the success of any collaborative collection, including the Target partnership. These distinctive patterns, often featuring bright colors, floral motifs, and whimsical designs, immediately communicate the brand’s aesthetic. This strong visual association allows consumers to readily identify Lilly Pulitzer designs, even within the context of a mass retailer like Target. Maintaining these signature prints within the collaborative collection ensures brand recognition and reinforces the designer’s established aesthetic. Examples include the brand’s iconic use of pink and green, often combined with preppy patterns like lobsters, anchors, and palm fronds. These motifs evoke a specific lifestyle and resonate with the brand’s target demographic.
The continued presence of these signature prints serves several crucial functions. They differentiate the collaborative collection from other Target offerings, attracting customers specifically seeking the Lilly Pulitzer aesthetic. The vibrant prints maintain brand consistency across different retail environments, reinforcing brand recognition and preventing dilution of the designer’s image. Furthermore, these prints contribute to the perceived value of the collection, justifying the price point, even within a more accessible retail setting. Leveraging existing brand recognition through signature prints minimizes the need for extensive marketing efforts to establish brand identity within the collaboration. This built-in brand recognition provides a significant advantage, allowing the collaboration to capitalize on pre-existing brand loyalty and consumer familiarity.
In summary, the signature vibrant prints function as a critical element within the Lilly Pulitzer and Target collaboration. They act as a powerful identifier of the brand, contributing to consumer recognition, maintaining brand consistency, and driving consumer demand. Successfully incorporating these established design elements allows the collaboration to effectively leverage existing brand equity while introducing the designer’s aesthetic to a wider audience. The strategic use of signature prints underscores the importance of maintaining core brand elements while navigating the complexities of designer-mass retailer partnerships. This careful balancing act allows for wider accessibility without compromising the established brand identity crucial for long-term success.
4. Expanded Customer Reach
The collaboration between Lilly Pulitzer and Target centers significantly around expanded customer reach. By partnering with a mass retailer, the typically exclusive designer brand gains access to a broader consumer demographic. This strategic move presents substantial opportunities for both entities, impacting brand visibility, market penetration, and long-term growth. Understanding the components of this expanded reach provides crucial insights into the collaboration’s overall strategic goals and potential impact on the fashion landscape.
-
Increased Accessibility
Target’s extensive network of physical stores and robust online presence provides significantly greater accessibility compared to Lilly Pulitzer’s standalone boutiques and online store. This widespread availability allows consumers in diverse geographical locations and varying economic backgrounds to access the collection. For example, a customer in a rural area without access to a high-end shopping mall can readily purchase the collaborative line through Target’s website. This increased accessibility significantly broadens the brand’s potential consumer base.
-
Introduction to New Demographics
Target’s customer base encompasses a wide range of demographics, including families, younger shoppers, and value-conscious consumers. The collaboration exposes the Lilly Pulitzer brand to individuals who may not have previously considered the brand due to price or limited availability. This introduction to new demographics can cultivate future brand loyalty and expand the designer’s market share. For instance, a younger consumer purchasing a Lilly Pulitzer dress from Target may become a lifelong customer, purchasing higher-priced items directly from the brand in the future.
-
Brand Awareness and Visibility
Partnering with a recognizable retailer like Target amplifies brand awareness. The collaboration generates media attention and social media buzz, exposing a wider audience to the Lilly Pulitzer aesthetic. This increased visibility can translate to greater brand recognition and contribute to the long-term growth of the designer brand. The collaborative launch often includes dedicated marketing campaigns and in-store displays, further enhancing brand visibility beyond Target’s existing customer base.
-
Strategic Market Penetration
The collaboration serves as a strategic market penetration tool for Lilly Pulitzer. By leveraging Target’s existing infrastructure and customer base, the designer gains access to new market segments without the investment required to establish a comparable retail presence independently. This strategic approach allows for efficient and cost-effective market expansion. Furthermore, it provides valuable market data and consumer insights, informing future brand strategies and product development decisions.
The expanded customer reach achieved through the Lilly Pulitzer and Target collaboration is a central component of the partnership’s strategic objectives. The increased accessibility, introduction to new demographics, heightened brand visibility, and strategic market penetration contribute to the overall success of the collaboration. By leveraging the strengths of both entities, the partnership maximizes market impact and positions both brands for continued growth within a competitive fashion landscape. This model of designer-mass retailer collaborations underscores the evolving dynamics of the industry and highlights the increasing importance of accessibility and wider market reach in achieving sustained brand success.
5. High demand anticipated
High demand is a crucial component of the “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” phenomenon. Several factors contribute to this anticipated surge in consumer interest. The brand’s established popularity, coupled with the limited-edition nature of the collection, creates a sense of scarcity and urgency among consumers. Target’s broad customer base, combined with the increased accessibility of the designer’s aesthetic through a lower price point, further fuels this anticipated demand. Past collaborations between high-end designers and mass retailers, such as Missoni for Target, experienced similar high demand, often resulting in rapid sell-outs and increased resale market activity. This precedent supports the prediction of significant consumer interest in the Lilly Pulitzer collection.
The implications of high demand are multifaceted. Retailers must anticipate potential logistical challenges, such as website crashes, long lines in physical stores, and inventory management issues. The limited availability and potential for rapid sell-outs can contribute to increased resale market activity, where items are sold at significantly inflated prices. This secondary market dynamic can create both opportunities and challenges for consumers. While some may benefit from reselling purchased items, others may face difficulty acquiring items at the original retail price. Understanding these market dynamics allows consumers to make informed purchasing decisions and manage expectations regarding product availability.
In summary, anticipated high demand is an integral aspect of the “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration. This expected surge in consumer interest is driven by factors such as brand recognition, scarcity, accessibility, and historical precedent. The implications of high demand extend beyond initial sales, impacting logistics, resale markets, and consumer behavior. Recognizing these interconnected elements provides valuable context for understanding the broader implications of this type of designer-mass retailer collaboration within the fashion industry. Analyzing these dynamics contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of contemporary consumer behavior and evolving market trends.
6. Potential resale market
The potential resale market plays a significant role in the dynamics surrounding limited-edition collaborations like “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target.” Limited availability, combined with high demand, often creates a secondary market where items are resold at potentially inflated prices. Understanding this resale market is crucial for both consumers and industry observers, as it impacts purchasing decisions, brand perception, and market trends.
-
Scarcity-Driven Value
Limited production runs intentionally create scarcity, driving up demand and consequently, resale value. This phenomenon is amplified by the accessibility of Target, exposing the brand to a larger audience than typical Lilly Pulitzer offerings, further increasing competition for limited items. Examples include past designer-Target collaborations, where items resold for multiples of their original price. This scarcity-driven value proposition can incentivize purchasing for resale, potentially leading to purchasing behaviors driven by profit rather than genuine product interest.
-
Platform Dynamics
Online resale platforms like eBay, Poshmark, and Mercari facilitate this secondary market, providing avenues for both sellers and buyers. These platforms introduce additional factors like seller fees, shipping costs, and authentication processes, further influencing resale prices. The accessibility of these platforms contributes to the growth and normalization of resale markets, impacting traditional retail models. Understanding platform-specific rules and practices is crucial for both buyers and sellers navigating this secondary market.
-
Brand Implications
The resale market can influence brand perception. High resale prices can contribute to a sense of exclusivity and desirability, potentially enhancing brand image. Conversely, widespread availability on resale platforms could diminish the perceived exclusivity of the original collaboration. The brand must carefully consider the potential long-term effects of resale activity on brand equity. This includes potential brand dilution through unauthorized sellers and counterfeit products, requiring ongoing brand protection strategies.
-
Consumer Behavior
The existence of a resale market influences consumer behavior. Some consumers may purchase with the intent to resell, contributing to initial sell-outs and limiting access for those primarily interested in personal use. Other consumers may rely on the resale market to acquire items they missed during the initial launch, potentially paying significantly higher prices. Understanding resale market dynamics empowers consumers to make informed purchasing decisions, weighing the benefits of immediate purchase versus the potential costs associated with delayed acquisition through resale platforms.
The potential resale market associated with “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” represents a complex interplay of scarcity, demand, platform dynamics, and consumer behavior. This secondary market has significant implications for brand perception, accessibility, and purchasing decisions. Analyzing these factors provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of fashion consumption and the increasing significance of resale markets in the modern retail environment. This understanding is crucial for both consumers seeking to navigate the complexities of acquiring limited-edition items and brands aiming to manage their brand image and market presence within this evolving ecosystem.
7. Fast-fashion collaboration
The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collection exemplifies a fast-fashion collaboration, characterized by a partnership between a high-end designer and a mass-market retailer to produce a limited-edition collection at accessible prices. This strategy leverages the designer’s brand recognition and the retailer’s wide distribution network to generate significant consumer interest and rapid sales. Analyzing the components of this fast-fashion model reveals its implications for both brands and consumers.
-
Compressed Production Cycles
Fast-fashion collaborations operate on compressed production timelines, enabling rapid responses to current trends. This accelerated schedule allows the “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collection to capitalize on seasonal demand and consumer preferences. However, this speed can raise concerns regarding ethical sourcing and sustainable manufacturing practices, particularly given the potential for increased demand and production volumes. Consumers benefit from readily accessible trendy items, yet the environmental and social costs associated with rapid production warrant consideration.
-
Affordability and Accessibility
A defining characteristic of fast-fashion is affordability. The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration adheres to this principle, making the designer’s aesthetic accessible to a wider consumer base. This democratization of design can introduce new customers to the brand, potentially fostering future brand loyalty. However, maintaining perceived value at lower price points presents a challenge. The collaboration must balance affordability with quality and design to avoid compromising the designer’s brand image.
-
Marketing and Hype Generation
Fast-fashion collaborations often employ targeted marketing campaigns and public relations strategies to generate pre-launch excitement. The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” partnership likely leveraged social media, influencer marketing, and traditional media outlets to create buzz and anticipation. This hype contributes to the perception of scarcity and urgency, driving consumer demand. However, this marketing-driven approach can also contribute to overconsumption and potentially unsustainable purchasing patterns. Critical evaluation of marketing messages is essential for responsible consumer engagement.
-
Limited-Edition Strategy and Scarcity
The limited-edition nature of the collection, typical of fast-fashion collaborations, creates a sense of urgency and exclusivity. This scarcity drives demand and contributes to the potential for a robust resale market. The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collection’s limited availability increases its perceived value, potentially driving prices up in the resale market. While this can benefit resellers, it can also disadvantage consumers seeking access to the collection at retail prices. This dynamic highlights the complex relationship between scarcity, value, and consumer behavior within the fast-fashion model.
The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration reflects broader trends within the fast-fashion industry. The partnership leverages the strengths of both brandsthe designer’s established aesthetic and the retailer’s expansive reachto create a highly anticipated and potentially profitable collection. However, the fast-fashion model’s inherent characteristics, such as compressed production cycles, emphasis on affordability, and marketing-driven hype, raise important considerations regarding sustainability, consumer behavior, and long-term brand implications. Analyzing this collaboration through the lens of fast fashion provides valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of the fashion industry and the complex relationship between brands, consumers, and market trends.
8. Brand Visibility Boost
The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration demonstrably boosted brand visibility for both entities involved. For Lilly Pulitzer, partnering with a mass retailer like Target exposed the brand to a significantly wider audience than its typical consumer base. This exposure translated into increased brand awareness among demographics less familiar with the designer’s aesthetic, potentially cultivating future brand loyalty. Target benefitted from the association with a recognized designer brand, attracting customers seeking unique, limited-edition products. The collaboration generated substantial media attention and social media buzz, further amplifying brand visibility for both partners. Similar collaborations, such as Missoni for Target, demonstrated comparable brand visibility gains for both the designer and the retailer, supporting the efficacy of this strategy.
The increased brand visibility stemming from the collaboration served distinct purposes for each partner. Lilly Pulitzer gained access to new market segments and broadened brand awareness beyond its traditional customer base. This expansion could lead to long-term growth and market diversification. Target enhanced its brand image by offering exclusive, desirable products, attracting customers seeking differentiated merchandise. The increased foot traffic and online activity generated by the collaboration further contributed to Target’s overall brand visibility. Analyzing website traffic, social media engagement, and traditional media coverage provides quantifiable measures of the brand visibility boost resulting from the collaboration. Understanding these metrics allows for data-driven evaluation of the collaboration’s effectiveness.
In summary, the “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration served as a successful brand visibility boost for both partners. The strategic alignment of a high-end designer with a mass retailer generated synergistic benefits, expanding market reach, attracting new customers, and generating significant media attention. Analyzing the components contributing to this increased visibility, such as media coverage, social media engagement, and website traffic, provides valuable insights into the dynamics of successful brand collaborations. This understanding can inform future partnerships and marketing strategies within the fashion industry, demonstrating the practical significance of brand visibility as a key component of successful collaborations.
9. Designer democratization
The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration serves as a prime example of designer democratization, a concept signifying increased accessibility of high-end fashion to a broader consumer base. This democratization challenges traditional exclusivity within the fashion industry, impacting brand perception, consumer behavior, and market dynamics. Examining the facets of this democratization within the context of the Lilly Pulitzer and Target partnership reveals its broader implications for the fashion landscape.
-
Bridging the Price Gap
Traditionally, designer clothing carries a high price tag, limiting accessibility to affluent consumers. Collaborations like “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” bridge this price gap, offering designer aesthetics at significantly lower costs. This affordability expands the potential consumer base, allowing individuals previously unable to afford Lilly Pulitzer products to participate in the brand experience. This shift challenges the notion of luxury as exclusively defined by high prices, potentially reshaping consumer perceptions of value and accessibility within the fashion industry. Examples include other successful designer-mass retailer partnerships like H&M’s collaborations with Karl Lagerfeld and Balmain, which demonstrated similar democratizing effects.
-
Expanding Distribution Channels
Designer brands typically operate through exclusive boutiques or high-end department stores, limiting geographic reach. Partnering with a mass retailer like Target dramatically expands distribution channels, making the collection accessible to consumers across diverse geographical locations. Target’s extensive network of physical stores and robust online presence provides broader access than Lilly Pulitzer’s traditional distribution model. This increased accessibility challenges traditional notions of exclusivity based on limited distribution, potentially transforming consumer expectations regarding product availability and purchasing convenience.
-
Challenging Exclusivity Norms
Designer fashion often relies on exclusivity to maintain brand prestige. The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration challenges these norms by making the designer’s aesthetic widely accessible. This shift can generate debate regarding brand dilution and the potential impact on the designer’s core customer base. However, it also introduces the brand to new demographics, potentially cultivating future brand loyalty among a wider consumer group. This democratization compels a reevaluation of the role of exclusivity in maintaining brand value within a rapidly evolving fashion landscape.
-
Driving Consumer Demand and Market Trends
Democratization through collaborations like “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” can significantly impact consumer demand and market trends. The increased accessibility generates broader consumer interest, potentially driving higher sales volumes. This surge in demand can influence future design decisions and collaborations, potentially leading to greater emphasis on affordability and accessibility within the fashion industry. This democratizing effect can contribute to a shift in market dynamics, potentially impacting the competitive landscape and reshaping the relationship between designers, retailers, and consumers.
The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration exemplifies the multifaceted nature of designer democratization. By increasing accessibility through lower prices and wider distribution, the collaboration challenges traditional notions of exclusivity and luxury within the fashion industry. This democratization impacts brand perception, consumer behavior, and market trends, prompting a broader discussion about the evolving relationship between designers, retailers, and consumers in a rapidly changing fashion landscape. The long-term implications of this democratizing trend warrant continued observation and analysis as it reshapes the future of fashion accessibility and consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the Lilly Pulitzer and Target collaboration, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: What characterized the Lilly Pulitzer and Target collaboration?
The collaboration offered a limited-edition collection of Lilly Pulitzer-designed apparel and accessories at Target’s accessible price point, featuring the designer’s signature vibrant prints and patterns.
Question 2: Why was this collaboration significant?
The partnership represented a notable example of designer democratization, making typically higher-priced fashion accessible to a wider consumer base through Target’s extensive distribution network.
Question 3: What impact did the limited-edition nature of the collection have?
Limited availability fueled high demand and often resulted in rapid sell-outs, contributing to a robust resale market where items were frequently sold above their original retail price.
Question 4: How did the collaboration benefit both brands?
Lilly Pulitzer gained increased brand visibility and access to new customer demographics, while Target attracted customers seeking unique, limited-edition items, enhancing its brand image.
Question 5: What challenges did the high demand create?
The surge in consumer interest led to logistical challenges, including website crashes, long lines at physical stores, and inventory management issues, highlighting the complexities of balancing supply with demand in high-profile collaborations.
Question 6: What were the long-term implications of this collaboration for the fashion industry?
The collaboration underscored the growing trend of designer democratization and the increasing importance of accessibility and wider market reach in achieving sustained brand success within a competitive fashion landscape.
Understanding these key aspects of the collaboration provides valuable context for analyzing its impact on both brands and the broader fashion industry.
The subsequent sections will delve deeper into specific elements of the collaboration, offering further analysis and insights.
Navigating Designer Collaborations at Mass Retailers
Successfully navigating high-demand, limited-edition designer collaborations at mass retailers requires strategic planning and informed decision-making. These tips offer practical guidance for maximizing opportunities and mitigating potential challenges.
Tip 1: Pre-Launch Research: Thoroughly research the collection beforehand. Understand pricing, sizing, available items, and store policies regarding returns and exchanges. Reviewing product images and specifications online prior to release allows for efficient purchasing decisions during the often-limited sales window.
Tip 2: Early Bird Advantage: High-demand collaborations frequently sell out rapidly. Planning to shop online at the launch time or arriving early at physical stores increases the likelihood of securing desired items before stock depletion. Setting reminders or utilizing waitlist features on retail websites can facilitate timely purchasing.
Tip 3: Account Preparation: Creating online retail accounts in advance streamlines the checkout process, saving valuable time during high-traffic periods. Pre-entering shipping and billing information reduces the risk of errors and delays, maximizing purchase efficiency.
Tip 4: Targeted Shopping Strategy: Prioritize desired items and focus on acquiring them first. Having a clear shopping list prevents distractions and ensures efficient use of limited purchasing time, particularly during high-demand situations.
Tip 5: Resale Market Awareness: Understand the potential resale market implications. While acquiring items for resale can be lucrative, inflated prices often characterize the secondary market. Weighing the potential benefits against the original retail price allows for informed purchasing decisions.
Tip 6: Budgetary Considerations: Establish a budget beforehand and adhere to it. The excitement surrounding limited-edition releases can lead to impulsive purchases. Disciplined spending practices prevent overspending and ensure alignment with personal financial goals.
Tip 7: Informed Purchasing Decisions: Focus on acquiring items aligned with personal style and existing wardrobe. The limited nature of these collaborations can encourage impulsive purchasing. Careful consideration of long-term value and wearability promotes sustainable consumption habits.
Implementing these strategies enhances the likelihood of a successful shopping experience during high-demand collaborations, promoting informed purchasing decisions and mitigating potential challenges associated with limited-edition releases.
The following conclusion synthesizes the key insights discussed throughout this analysis, offering a comprehensive overview of the “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” collaboration and its broader implications.
The Impact and Implications of Lilly Pulitzer Dresses at Target
Analysis of the “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” phenomenon reveals key insights into contemporary fashion dynamics. The collaboration demonstrates the increasing prevalence of designer democratization, expanding access to high-end aesthetics through strategic partnerships with mass retailers. Limited-edition releases, coupled with accessible price points, generate substantial consumer demand, often resulting in rapid sell-outs and active resale markets. This strategy benefits both designers, through increased brand visibility and market penetration, and retailers, through enhanced brand image and increased traffic. However, the model also presents challenges, including logistical complexities associated with high demand and potential concerns regarding ethical production practices within compressed timelines. The collaboration exemplifies the evolving relationship between exclusivity, accessibility, and consumer behavior within the fashion industry.
The “Lilly Pulitzer dresses Target” case study serves as a valuable model for understanding the evolving landscape of fashion consumption. Further analysis of similar collaborations will provide deeper insights into the long-term impacts of designer democratization on brand equity, consumer preferences, and market sustainability. Continued observation of these trends is crucial for both industry stakeholders and consumers navigating the increasingly complex intersection of high fashion and mass retail.
