In American football, the area inside the opponent’s 20-yard line is known as the red zone. A pass attempt intended for a receiver within this area is a high-value play, often crucial for scoring touchdowns. Analyzing which players are targeted within this critical area provides insights into offensive strategy and player performance. For example, a team frequently throwing to a tall tight end near the goal line suggests a focus on exploiting size mismatches.
Understanding pass attempts within the red zone is essential for evaluating offensive efficiency and predicting future performance. This area represents the highest probability of scoring, making target distribution a key indicator of play-calling tendencies and player utilization. Historically, teams successful in converting red zone opportunities into touchdowns often achieve greater overall success. Analyzing these patterns provides valuable context for pre-game preparation and in-game adjustments.
This analysis will delve into various aspects of inside-the-20 passing plays, including player performance, strategic implications, and historical trends, offering a detailed perspective on how teams utilize their personnel to maximize scoring potential in this critical area of the field.
1. Target Distribution
Target distribution within the Buffalo Bills’ red zone offense reveals key insights into their strategic approach and personnel usage. Analyzing which players receive targets inside the opponent’s 20-yard line illuminates play-calling tendencies, quarterback preferences, and potential exploitations of defensive matchups. For instance, a high percentage of targets to Stefon Diggs suggests his reliability as a primary receiving threat, even under pressure. Conversely, a more balanced distribution among multiple receivers may indicate a scheme designed to spread the defense and create opportunities based on pre-snap reads.
Examining target distribution over multiple games reveals trends and adjustments. An increase in targets to a specific player could reflect his improved performance, a shift in offensive strategy, or an opponent’s defensive vulnerabilities. For example, if the Bills face a team with a weak secondary, they might increase targets to their deep-threat receivers. Alternatively, against a strong run defense, they may prioritize passes to tight ends or running backs in short-yardage situations. Comparing target distribution against different opponents provides valuable context for understanding how the Bills adapt their game plan.
Understanding target distribution provides a critical foundation for analyzing the effectiveness of the Bills’ red zone offense. It allows for the identification of key players, preferred routes, and potential areas for improvement. By examining these patterns, one can gain a deeper understanding of how the Bills aim to maximize scoring opportunities within this crucial area of the field. Furthermore, this analysis offers predictive value, potentially anticipating future play calls and assessing the likelihood of scoring touchdowns based on specific game situations and opponent matchups. This detailed perspective is essential for informed commentary and strategic assessments of the Bills’ offensive performance.
2. Receiver Types
Receiver types significantly influence red zone target distribution for the Buffalo Bills. Different receiver skill sets present unique advantages within the condensed field space near the goal line. Tall, physical receivers like tight ends excel in jump-ball situations and contested catches, making them ideal targets for fades and back-shoulder throws. Conversely, smaller, shiftier receivers leverage quickness and route-running precision to exploit tight coverage, creating separation for short slants and quick outs. Dawson Knox’s size makes him a prime target for lofted passes in the end zone, while Stefon Diggs’ route-running prowess enables him to find open space underneath for crucial third-down conversions.
The Bills’ strategic deployment of diverse receiver types enhances red zone efficiency. Matching receiver strengths against defensive weaknesses creates mismatches, increasing the likelihood of successful plays. For example, isolating a tight end against a smaller cornerback presents a significant size advantage, leading to a higher probability of a completed pass. Similarly, employing a speedy slot receiver against a slower linebacker exploits speed discrepancies. Understanding these strategic matchups provides insight into play-calling decisions and potential outcomes. The Bills’ ability to effectively utilize various receiver types expands their offensive playbook and creates a more dynamic and unpredictable red zone attack.
Analyzing the Bills’ red zone performance requires careful consideration of receiver types and their utilization. Observing target distribution across different receiver archetypes reveals offensive tendencies and potential vulnerabilities. This understanding provides a framework for predicting future play calls, assessing matchup advantages, and ultimately, evaluating overall offensive effectiveness within this critical scoring area. Challenges remain, such as defensive adjustments and unpredictable game situations. However, a thorough understanding of how the Bills leverage receiver types within the red zone provides valuable context for analyzing their offensive strategy and predicting their success in converting red zone opportunities into touchdowns.
3. Play Selection
Play selection within the red zone is a critical determinant of the Buffalo Bills’ offensive success. The limited field space and increased scoring opportunity necessitate a strategic approach to play calling, directly influencing which players are targeted and the likelihood of converting drives into touchdowns. Understanding the Bills’ red zone play selection provides insights into their offensive philosophy and ability to exploit opponent vulnerabilities.
-
Run-Pass Balance
The balance between run and pass plays within the red zone significantly impacts target distribution. A run-heavy approach limits passing opportunities, concentrating targets among a smaller group of receivers, often tight ends or running backs utilized in short-yardage passing situations. Conversely, a pass-heavy approach spreads targets across a wider range of receivers, increasing the importance of route running and individual matchups. The Bills’ run-pass balance within the red zone adapts to opponent defensive strengths and weaknesses, influencing their overall target distribution strategy.
-
Formation and Personnel
Offensive formations and personnel groupings provide clues regarding intended play calls and potential targets. Heavy formations with multiple tight ends often suggest run plays or short passes, concentrating targets near the line of scrimmage. Spread formations with multiple receivers indicate a higher likelihood of passing plays, distributing targets more widely across the field. Analyzing the Bills’ red zone formations and personnel packages provides insight into their play-calling tendencies and potential target distribution.
-
Down and Distance
Down and distance significantly influence play selection and target distribution. Short-yardage situations favor run plays or high-percentage short passes, targeting players capable of securing crucial first downs. Longer down and distances necessitate riskier plays, often involving deeper throws to receivers capable of making contested catches downfield. Understanding the Bills’ play selection based on down and distance provides context for their red zone target distribution and overall offensive strategy.
-
Exploiting Matchups
Play selection in the red zone often aims to exploit specific matchups. If a receiver has a favorable one-on-one matchup against a smaller defender, the play call may feature a designed route to isolate that receiver, increasing their target likelihood. Similarly, if the opponent’s defense is vulnerable to play-action passes, play selection may incorporate these tactics to create opportunities for receivers downfield. Analyzing the Bills’ play selection in relation to opponent matchups provides insight into their strategic decision-making and ability to maximize scoring opportunities within the red zone.
By understanding the interplay of these factors, one gains a comprehensive understanding of how play selection dictates target distribution within the Bills’ red zone offense. This analysis reveals not only which players are targeted but also why, providing a deeper understanding of their strategic approach and potential for success. Furthermore, it allows for a more nuanced evaluation of offensive performance, moving beyond simple statistics to uncover the underlying decision-making processes that drive red zone efficiency.
4. Defensive Matchups
Defensive matchups significantly influence red zone target distribution for the Buffalo Bills. Opponent defensive schemes and individual player matchups dictate which receivers are targeted and how the Bills design their plays within this critical scoring area. Understanding these matchups is crucial for analyzing the Bills’ offensive strategy and predicting their success in converting red zone opportunities into touchdowns.
-
Coverage Schemes
Opponent coverage schemes, whether man-to-man or zone, heavily influence target distribution. Man coverage often leads to isolating specific receivers, creating one-on-one opportunities for the Bills’ top playmakers. Against zone coverage, the Bills may target receivers in soft spots or exploit seams between defenders. Recognizing the opponent’s coverage scheme is essential for understanding which Bills receivers are likely to be targeted.
-
Individual Matchups
Individual matchups between Bills receivers and opposing defensive backs dictate target opportunities. A receiver with a significant size or speed advantage over their defender becomes a prime target. For example, Stefon Diggs matched against a smaller cornerback might receive more targets, particularly on fade routes or jump balls in the end zone. Analyzing these individual matchups provides insight into potential target distribution.
-
Blitzing Tendencies
Opponent blitzing tendencies affect target distribution. Blitzes create opportunities for quick passes, often targeting running backs or receivers on short routes. If the opponent frequently blitzes, the Bills may prioritize targets to players adept at exploiting these vulnerabilities. Conversely, if the opponent rarely blitzes, the Bills might favor deeper routes, targeting receivers downfield.
-
Safety Positioning and Help
Safety positioning and the presence of safety help over the top influence target distribution. If the opponent employs a single-high safety, the Bills may target receivers deep downfield. Conversely, two-high safeties limit deep throws, shifting targets towards underneath routes or intermediate throws. Recognizing safety alignments provides insight into the Bills’ target distribution strategy.
Analyzing defensive matchups provides a framework for understanding the Bills’ red zone target distribution. Recognizing opponent coverage schemes, individual player matchups, blitzing tendencies, and safety alignments provides valuable context for predicting which receivers are likely to be targeted and how the Bills design their plays within this crucial scoring area. This understanding is essential for evaluating offensive performance and anticipating the Bills’ success in converting red zone opportunities into touchdowns.
5. Quarterback Tendencies
Quarterback tendencies significantly influence red zone target distribution for the Buffalo Bills. A quarterback’s preferred throwing style, risk tolerance, and pre-snap reads directly impact which receivers are targeted inside the opponent’s 20-yard line. Understanding these tendencies provides crucial insights into the Bills’ offensive strategy and their likelihood of scoring touchdowns.
A quarterback who favors short, high-percentage throws might target running backs and tight ends more frequently in the red zone, prioritizing possession and minimizing turnovers. Conversely, a quarterback with a stronger arm and higher risk tolerance might attempt more downfield throws, targeting wide receivers capable of making contested catches. Josh Allen, with his strong arm and ability to extend plays, might target Gabriel Davis deep, even against tight coverage, while also utilizing Cole Beasley on underneath routes when facing pressure. These tendencies reflect not only the quarterback’s individual skillset but also the team’s overall offensive philosophy.
Analyzing quarterback tendencies reveals how play-calling adapts to different game situations. In crucial short-yardage situations, a quarterback might target his most reliable receiver, regardless of coverage, prioritizing a first down. Near the goal line, tendencies shift towards targeting players with a height advantage or those adept at finding open space in the end zone. Understanding these tendencies allows for a more nuanced analysis of play selection, going beyond simply charting targets to uncover the underlying decision-making processes that drive red zone efficiency. Furthermore, studying historical trends in quarterback tendencies provides valuable context for predicting future play calls and assessing the likelihood of scoring touchdowns based on specific game situations and opponent matchups.
6. Success Rates (Touchdowns)
Success rates within the red zone, specifically the conversion of targets into touchdowns, serve as a critical performance indicator for the Buffalo Bills’ offense. Analyzing touchdown efficiency reveals the effectiveness of play-calling, quarterback execution, and receiver performance within this crucial scoring area. This analysis provides valuable insights into the team’s ability to capitalize on scoring opportunities and ultimately, their overall offensive potency.
-
Target Quality
Target quality significantly impacts touchdown conversion rates. Well-placed, accurate throws to receivers in advantageous positions increase the likelihood of a touchdown. Conversely, poorly thrown balls or targets to tightly covered receivers decrease scoring probability. Evaluating target quality provides context for understanding touchdown success rates, distinguishing between effective play design and execution versus unfavorable matchups or individual errors.
-
Receiver Performance
Receiver performance plays a crucial role in converting red zone targets into touchdowns. A receiver’s ability to create separation from defenders, make contested catches, and secure the ball in traffic directly impacts scoring success. Analyzing individual receiver performance within the red zone identifies key contributors and potential areas for improvement. For example, a receiver consistently dropping passes or failing to gain separation negatively impacts touchdown conversion rates.
-
Play Design and Execution
Play design and execution contribute significantly to red zone touchdown success. Plays that effectively scheme receivers open create high-percentage scoring opportunities. Precise route running, accurate throws, and effective blocking all contribute to successful play execution. Conversely, predictable play calls or poor execution can hinder touchdown conversion rates, highlighting the importance of strategic play design and consistent performance.
-
Opponent Defensive Performance
Opponent defensive performance influences the Bills’ red zone touchdown success rates. A strong opponent defense, skilled at disrupting passing plays and creating turnovers, reduces scoring opportunities. Conversely, a weaker defense allows for more successful conversions. Analyzing opponent defensive performance within the red zone provides context for evaluating the Bills’ offensive efficiency. A high touchdown rate against a strong defense indicates superior offensive execution, while a low rate against a weak defense suggests potential areas for improvement.
Analyzing these facets provides a comprehensive understanding of how red zone targets translate into touchdowns for the Buffalo Bills. This analysis goes beyond simply measuring success rates, delving into the underlying factors that contribute to scoring efficiency. By examining target quality, receiver performance, play design and execution, and opponent defensive performance, one gains a deeper understanding of the Bills’ offensive capabilities and their ability to capitalize on scoring opportunities within the red zone. This nuanced perspective provides valuable insights for evaluating team performance, predicting future outcomes, and ultimately, understanding the Bills’ overall offensive success.
7. Field Position Influence
Field position significantly influences red zone target distribution for the Buffalo Bills. Starting drives closer to the opponent’s end zone increases the likelihood of reaching the red zone, subsequently impacting target distribution and play-calling strategy. Conversely, drives originating deep in their own territory necessitate longer, more sustained offensive efforts, potentially altering target distribution based on field position and down-and-distance situations. Understanding this dynamic provides crucial context for analyzing the Bills’ offensive approach.
-
Starting Field Position and Drive Length
The Bills’ starting field position directly correlates with drive length and the probability of reaching the red zone. Favorable field position, such as following a turnover or a strong special teams play, shortens the required yardage to reach scoring territory, increasing red zone opportunities and influencing target distribution towards players typically utilized closer to the goal line. Conversely, poor starting field position necessitates longer drives, potentially shifting target distribution based on down-and-distance situations and the need for sustained offensive momentum.
-
Play-Calling Aggressiveness
Field position influences play-calling aggressiveness, impacting target distribution. When already deep in opponent territory, the Bills may employ a more conservative approach, prioritizing ball control and short, high-percentage passes to minimize turnovers. This typically concentrates targets towards reliable possession receivers or check-down options. Conversely, when further from the red zone, the Bills might incorporate more aggressive downfield throws, targeting deep threats in an attempt to gain significant yardage quickly, thereby altering target distribution.
-
Impact of Penalties and Turnovers
Penalties and turnovers dramatically alter field position and consequently, red zone target distribution. Offensive penalties push the Bills further from the end zone, potentially necessitating longer passes and a shift in target distribution. Turnovers, particularly deep in their own territory, create favorable field position for the opponent, reducing the Bills’ red zone opportunities. Defensive takeaways, conversely, can create short fields and increased scoring chances, leading to a higher concentration of targets near the goal line.
-
Clock Management and Game Situation
Field position plays a critical role in clock management and game situation decisions, indirectly influencing red zone target distribution. Late in the game, with a lead, favorable field position allows the Bills to utilize a more conservative, run-heavy approach to drain the clock, reducing passing opportunities and concentrating targets towards players involved in short-yardage situations. Conversely, trailing late in the game and needing to score quickly, field position dictates a more aggressive pass-heavy approach, potentially increasing targets to deep threats or receivers adept at creating separation in crucial situations.
By analyzing the interplay between field position and target distribution, one gains a deeper understanding of the Bills’ strategic adaptability and offensive efficiency. Recognizing how field position influences play-calling, quarterback decisions, and receiver utilization provides valuable context for evaluating overall performance and predicting outcomes. This detailed perspective highlights the dynamic nature of red zone target distribution, showcasing how it adapts to various game situations and field position advantages or disadvantages.
8. Game Situation Impact
Game situation significantly influences red zone target distribution for the Buffalo Bills. Factors such as score differential, time remaining, down-and-distance, and possession all contribute to the strategic decisions made regarding which receivers are targeted within the opponent’s 20-yard line. Understanding these situational influences is crucial for analyzing play-calling tendencies and predicting offensive outcomes.
-
Score Differential
The score differential dictates offensive urgency and risk tolerance, directly impacting target distribution. A large lead allows for a more conservative approach, potentially favoring running plays or short passes to control the clock and minimize turnovers. This scenario might emphasize targets to running backs or tight ends on check-down routes. Conversely, a significant deficit necessitates greater risk-taking, potentially leading to more downfield throws and increased targets to wide receivers capable of making contested catches. A tied game or close score differential typically results in a more balanced approach, with target distribution influenced by other situational factors.
-
Time Remaining
Time remaining in the game significantly influences play selection and target distribution. With ample time, the Bills can utilize a more methodical approach, patiently working the ball downfield and distributing targets based on matchups and evolving game flow. Limited time, however, necessitates a more urgent approach, prioritizing quick passes and potentially concentrating targets towards receivers adept at creating separation on short routes. In two-minute drill scenarios, target distribution might heavily favor the team’s most reliable receiver, regardless of defensive coverage, to maximize the chances of a quick score.
-
Down and Distance
Down and distance within the red zone dictate play selection and consequently, target distribution. Short-yardage situations often favor running plays or high-percentage passes to tight ends or running backs, prioritizing a first down or a quick score. Longer down-and-distance scenarios require riskier play calls, potentially leading to increased targets to receivers further downfield. Third-and-long situations in the red zone often dictate passing plays, and the Bills’ target distribution will likely reflect the quarterback’s preferred targets in these high-pressure moments.
-
Possession
Possession status significantly impacts red zone play-calling and target distribution. The final possession of a half or the game often leads to more conservative play selection, prioritizing field goal attempts over risky plays that could result in a turnover. This favors shorter passes to more reliable receivers. Conversely, when not possessing the ball, defensive strategy and the opponent’s score influence the Bills’ subsequent offensive approach. For example, if the opponent scores quickly, the Bills may adopt a more aggressive passing attack, altering target distribution to prioritize receivers capable of generating explosive plays.
Analyzing these interwoven situational factors reveals a dynamic interplay between game context and target distribution within the Bills’ red zone offense. Understanding how score differential, time remaining, down and distance, and possession status influence play-calling decisions and receiver utilization provides valuable insights for predicting outcomes and evaluating offensive performance. This nuanced understanding goes beyond simply charting targets, illuminating the strategic decision-making processes that drive red zone efficiency.
9. Historical Trends
Examining historical trends in red zone target distribution provides valuable context for understanding the Buffalo Bills’ current offensive strategies and predicting future performance. Trends reveal evolving play-calling philosophies, personnel usage, and overall offensive efficiency within this critical scoring area. Analyzing past performance illuminates how the team has adapted to rule changes, personnel changes, and evolving defensive schemes. For instance, a shift towards increased targets to tight ends over several seasons might reflect a league-wide trend emphasizing tight end involvement in the passing game, or it could indicate the Bills’ acquisition of a particularly skilled tight end.
Specific examples illustrate the practical significance of analyzing historical trends. Suppose the Bills historically struggled to convert red zone opportunities into touchdowns against a particular divisional rival. Analyzing past target distribution in those matchups might reveal a tendency to overuse certain plays or target specific receivers who struggled against that opponent’s defensive scheme. This historical analysis could inform future game planning, leading to adjustments in play-calling and personnel usage to exploit identified weaknesses. Conversely, identifying historically successful red zone strategies against specific opponents or defensive schemes provides a valuable framework for replicating past success. Perhaps a specific formation or play consistently generated touchdowns against a particular type of coverage. Recognizing these historical trends allows for informed decision-making and potentially increases the likelihood of future success.
Understanding historical trends offers a crucial foundation for evaluating the Bills’ current red zone performance. By comparing current target distribution and touchdown efficiency to historical data, one can assess whether the team is improving, stagnating, or regressing within this critical scoring area. However, relying solely on historical trends presents limitations. Opponent defensive schemes and personnel evolve, requiring the Bills’ offense to adapt and innovate. While historical trends provide valuable context, they must be considered alongside other factors, such as current matchups, player performance, and evolving game situations, to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the Bills’ red zone offense.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding red zone target distribution for the Buffalo Bills, providing concise and informative responses.
Question 1: How does weather impact red zone target distribution?
Inclement weather often leads to a more conservative approach, favoring shorter passes and potentially increasing targets to running backs and tight ends. Strong winds can significantly impact deep throws, making shorter, higher-percentage passes more appealing.
Question 2: Does the Bills’ offensive line play influence red zone target distribution?
A strong offensive line provides more time for the quarterback, allowing for deeper routes and potentially increasing targets to receivers further downfield. Conversely, a struggling offensive line necessitates quicker throws, potentially concentrating targets towards receivers on short routes.
Question 3: How do injuries impact red zone target distribution?
Injuries to key receivers significantly alter target distribution. The absence of a primary target necessitates increased opportunities for other receivers, potentially shifting the focus towards different player types or skillsets. For example, an injury to a deep threat might lead to increased targets to possession receivers or tight ends.
Question 4: How does red zone target distribution relate to fantasy football performance?
Red zone targets are a valuable metric for assessing fantasy football potential. Receivers who consistently receive targets within the red zone have a higher probability of scoring touchdowns, a key factor in fantasy scoring. Understanding target distribution helps predict touchdown potential and inform fantasy roster decisions.
Question 5: How does coaching philosophy influence target distribution in the red zone?
A coach’s offensive philosophy significantly impacts target distribution. A coach who prioritizes a balanced offensive attack may distribute targets more evenly across different receiver types. Conversely, a coach favoring a pass-heavy approach might concentrate targets towards a smaller group of primary receivers.
Question 6: How can one access data on Bills red zone target distribution?
Various sports analytics websites and platforms provide detailed data on NFL teams’ red zone performance, including target distribution, touchdown efficiency, and other relevant metrics. These resources allow fans and analysts to delve deeper into team and player performance within this critical scoring area.
Analyzing red zone target distribution provides valuable insights into the Bills’ offensive strategy and performance. Understanding the factors influencing target distributionfrom weather conditions to coaching philosophyenhances one’s ability to predict outcomes and evaluate overall offensive efficiency.
This concludes the discussion on frequently asked questions. The following section will delve further into advanced analytics related to red zone efficiency.
Optimizing Red Zone Efficiency
Maximizing scoring opportunities within the red zone requires a strategic approach. The following tips offer valuable insights for optimizing red zone performance, focusing on play design, personnel utilization, and opponent analysis.
Tip 1: Exploit Matchups: Leverage size advantages by targeting taller receivers against smaller defensive backs, especially near the goal line. Creating mismatches through personnel groupings and pre-snap motion enhances scoring probability.
Tip 2: Diversify Play-Calling: Avoid predictability. Balance run and pass plays, incorporating play-action to keep defenses off-balance. Varying formations and personnel groupings creates uncertainty, increasing the likelihood of finding open receivers.
Tip 3: Utilize Play-Action Effectively: Play-action passing exploits defensive tendencies to react to run threats, creating opportunities for receivers downfield. This tactic is particularly effective near the goal line, where defenses anticipate short-yardage runs.
Tip 4: Target the Middle of the Field: Intermediate routes over the middle of the field exploit vulnerabilities in zone coverage and create opportunities for yards after the catch. Tight ends and slot receivers excel in these areas.
Tip 5: Emphasize Pre-Snap Reads: Quarterbacks must quickly assess defensive alignments and coverage schemes pre-snap to identify potential targets and adjust play calls accordingly. Effective pre-snap reads exploit defensive vulnerabilities and maximize scoring opportunities.
Tip 6: Practice Red Zone Situations: Dedicated red zone practice sessions refine execution and timing. Repetitive drills improve quarterback-receiver chemistry, blocking coordination, and overall offensive efficiency within the condensed field space.
Tip 7: Analyze Opponent Tendencies: Study opponent defensive tendencies within the red zone. Identify coverage preferences, blitzing patterns, and personnel usage. This analysis informs play-calling decisions and creates opportunities to exploit defensive weaknesses.
Tip 8: Adapt to Game Situations: Game context, including score differential, time remaining, and down-and-distance, significantly influences optimal red zone strategy. Adjusting play-calling based on these factors maximizes scoring opportunities and manages risk effectively.
Implementing these strategic insights enhances red zone efficiency, translating opportunities into touchdowns. Consistent execution and adaptability remain crucial for achieving sustained success within this critical scoring area.
The following conclusion synthesizes key findings and offers final recommendations for optimizing red zone performance.
Conclusion
Analysis of Buffalo Bills red zone targets reveals crucial insights into offensive strategy and scoring potential. Target distribution illuminates player utilization, play-calling tendencies, and opponent-specific adjustments. Examining receiver types, play selection, defensive matchups, quarterback tendencies, success rates, field position influence, game situation impact, and historical trends provides a comprehensive understanding of red zone performance. Success within this critical area hinges on exploiting favorable matchups, diversifying play-calling, utilizing play-action effectively, targeting the middle of the field, emphasizing pre-snap reads, practicing red zone situations, analyzing opponent tendencies, and adapting to game situations.
Maximizing red zone efficiency requires continuous evaluation and adaptation. Ongoing analysis of these factors allows for informed decision-making, strategic adjustments, and ultimately, increased touchdown conversion rates. Sustained success in the red zone significantly contributes to overall team performance and achieving season goals. Further exploration of advanced analytics and opponent-specific strategies will continue to refine understanding and optimize red zone performance for the Buffalo Bills.
